On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.

On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?

Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,

Best,

Sal

---------------------------------------------------------------

Salvatore La Cavera III

Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow

Nottingham Research Fellow

Optics and Photonics Group

University of Nottingham
Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102

<Outlook-0n0qekvu.png>

Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!

---

From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org>
Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24
To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org>
Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025

 

Hi Kareem,

thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.

Best,

Robert

-- 

Dr. Robert Prevedel

Group Leader and Senior Scientist

Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit

European Molecular Biology Laboratory

Meyerhofstr. 1

69117 Heidelberg, Germany

Phone: +49 6221 387-8722

Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de

http://www.prevedel.embl.de

On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:

Hi All,

 

So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).

 

Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!

 

Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14^th November)

Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?

 

Mon 10^th Nov. 11-12am

Tue 11^th Nov. 2-3pm

Thur 13^th Nov 12-1pm

Fri 14^th Nov 9-10am

 

All the best,

Kareem

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org
To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.