Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem
Hi Kareem, thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All,
So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).
Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!
Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?
Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am
All the best, Kareem
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
Hi everyone, Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, Best, Sal --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 [cid:f74fb791-7eb1-4ee9-8fb2-e5145ea57b28]<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem, thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
Hi Sal, I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best! Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All,
So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).
Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!
Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?
Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am
All the best, Kareem
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
Hi Robert, Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed. --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 [cid:3c864850-9568-4bc2-9681-273e48a0b27b]<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Sal, I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best! Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: Hi everyone, Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, Best, Sal --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png><https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem, thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...>
Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All,
So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).
Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!
Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?
Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am
All the best, Kareem
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :) --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 [cid:92e23bd3-d724-4f66-a18e-04bc4ba4cacf]<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 20:58 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert Begin forwarded message: From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Dear Robert, Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding. Best, Nina From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious<https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...> Dear Nina, I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839). We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions. We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field. Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process. With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort, Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!qYecbGhE1HwGA9SLg7WYBpRQpfBqO3zPIhlCqr6DBGPwirq8I_pQOQ85xt1Gl0KA90-2QfY2SZDhVpADzpIX$> On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: Hi Robert, Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed. --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png><https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Sal, I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best! Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: Hi everyone, Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, Best, Sal --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png><https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! ________________________________ From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem, thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org<mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
Hi @ll :) Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports. Best, Pierre Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria 
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 20:58 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...>
Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All,
So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).
Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!
Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?
Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am
All the best, Kareem
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi Pierre, I like your idea of having some reference to the other presentations. Maybe instead of a dichotomy, we could reference all 3 presentations ? See attached my attempt. On my poster BrimView would be on top and "highlighted" in green, on your poster the HDF5_BLS one, and on Carlo's the BrimFile. (The color palette should work with EMBL green and meduniwien green - the one from the webpage). (FYI: I made the SVG with inkscape, and for me it doesn't display as expected with Edge) Best, Sebastian Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 05.11.2025 um 09:59 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi @ll :)
Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports.
Best,
Pierre
/Pierre Bouvet, PhD/ /Post-doctoral Fellow/ /Medical University Vienna/ /Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology/ /Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, //Austria/
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> *Sent:* 03 November 2025 20:58 *To:* Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> *Cc:* Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:* Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> *Subject: **Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)* *Date: *3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET *To: *Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> *Cc: *Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
*From: *Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> *Date: *Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM *To: *Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> *Cc: *Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> *Subject: *Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...> Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk ORCID iD:0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:*Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> *Sent:*03 November 2025 12:14 *To:*Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> *Cc:*Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:*Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk ORCID iD:0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:*Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> *Sent:*03 November 2025 08:24 *To:*Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> *Cc:*Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:*[Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14^th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10^th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11^th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13^th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14^th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem _______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi Sebastian, I really like your idea and visual! I don’t think on our side at least the colors will be a problem so as long as you have thumbs up on your side we should be OK. The only two remarks I have are 1 - The HDF5_BLS project is not only a unified solution for data processing in BLS but also for storing data from all BLS modalities (and any other complimentary modality). 2 - BrimView is not compatible with the HDF5_BLS project, and from what I understand, only uses the HDF5_BLS_treat package for the integrated algorithm you have defined (ie: it does not take advantage of the modularity of algorithms at the core of the module, it does not allow the user to go through the algorithm to change any of the parameters of the functions - eg the size of the window before the fit or the boundary conditions on the linewidth, is not able to run a stored HDF5_BLS_treat algorithm and does not allow neither import nor export of these algorithms as standalone JSON files). This is why I thought going with a “non-BLS end-users” vs “BLS researchers” was more interesting: it allowed to logically differentiate our two approaches without opposing them as the needs of these two communities are very different (the analogy I made with high-level and low-level programming). Let me know what you think :) Pierre Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 6/11/25, at 14:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I like your idea of having some reference to the other presentations. Maybe instead of a dichotomy, we could reference all 3 presentations ? See attached my attempt.
On my poster BrimView would be on top and "highlighted" in green, on your poster the HDF5_BLS one, and on Carlo's the BrimFile. (The color palette should work with EMBL green and meduniwien green - the one from the webpage).
<KSrWrdrRpXoqZQuC.png>
(FYI: I made the SVG with inkscape, and for me it doesn't display as expected with Edge)
Best,
Sebastian
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 05.11.2025 um 09:59 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi @ll :)
Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports.
Best,
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 20:58 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...>
Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de> http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/>
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/>
On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi All,
So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant).
Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort!
Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you?
Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am
All the best, Kareem
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> <collaboration-logo.svg>_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
Hi all, Following our meeting, I've made the changes to my proposed schema/logo: - "Unified Brillouin Scattering Toolkit" for the title - Brimfile: BLS Bio-image application - HDF5_BLS: Biophysics & data processing Are we all fine with the text ? Here's also the svg : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gbkEb_Sdsf86yCNoDhwoNXqoU2iJgXcu?usp... and I'll put my poster there too later Best, Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 06.11.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi Sebastian,
I really like your idea and visual! I don’t think on our side at least the colors will be a problem so as long as you have thumbs up on your side we should be OK. The only two remarks I have are 1 - The HDF5_BLS project is not only a unified solution for data processing in BLS but also for storing data from all BLS modalities (and any other complimentary modality). 2 - BrimView is not compatible with the HDF5_BLS project, and from what I understand, only uses the HDF5_BLS_treat package for the integrated algorithm you have defined (ie: it does not take advantage of the modularity of algorithms at the core of the module, it does not allow the user to go through the algorithm to change any of the parameters of the functions - eg the size of the window before the fit or the boundary conditions on the linewidth, is not able to run a stored HDF5_BLS_treat algorithm and does not allow neither import nor export of these algorithms as standalone JSON files). This is why I thought going with a “non-BLS end-users” vs “BLS researchers” was more interesting: it allowed to logically differentiate our two approaches without opposing them as the needs of these two communities are very different (the analogy I made with high-level and low-level programming).
Let me know what you think :)
Pierre
/Pierre Bouvet, PhD/ /Post-doctoral Fellow/ /Medical University Vienna/ /Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology/ /Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, //Austria/
On 6/11/25, at 14:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I like your idea of having some reference to the other presentations. Maybe instead of a dichotomy, we could reference all 3 presentations ? See attached my attempt.
On my poster BrimView would be on top and "highlighted" in green, on your poster the HDF5_BLS one, and on Carlo's the BrimFile. (The color palette should work with EMBL green and meduniwien green - the one from the webpage).
<KSrWrdrRpXoqZQuC.png>
(FYI: I made the SVG with inkscape, and for me it doesn't display as expected with Edge)
Best,
Sebastian
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 05.11.2025 um 09:59 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi @ll :)
Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports.
Best,
Pierre
/Pierre Bouvet, PhD/ /Post-doctoral Fellow/ /Medical University Vienna/ /Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology/ /Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, //Austria/
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software<software@biobrillouin.org>wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD:0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:*Robert Prevedel<prevedel@embl.de> *Sent:*03 November 2025 20:58 *To:*Sal La Cavera III (staff)<Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> *Cc:*Kareem Elsayad via Software<software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:*Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Nina Vogt<nina.vogt@us.nature.com> *Subject: **Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)* *Date: *3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET *To: *Robert Prevedel<prevedel@embl.de> *Cc: *Kareem Elsayad<kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
*From: *Robert Prevedel<prevedel@embl.de> *Date: *Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM *To: *Nina Vogt<nina.vogt@us.nature.com> *Cc: *Kareem Elsayad<kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> *Subject: *Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...> Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email:robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff)<Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk>wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk ORCID iD:0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:*Robert Prevedel<prevedel@embl.de> *Sent:*03 November 2025 12:14 *To:*Sal La Cavera III (staff)<Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> *Cc:*Kareem Elsayad via Software<software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:*Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email:robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff)<Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk>wrote:
Hi everyone,
Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots.
On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going?
Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin,
Best,
Sal
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk ORCID iD:0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...>
Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:*Robert Prevedel via Software<software@biobrillouin.org> *Sent:*03 November 2025 08:24 *To:*Kareem Elsayad<kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> *Cc:*Kareem Elsayad via Software<software@biobrillouin.org> *Subject:*[Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem,
thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email:robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
> On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via > Software<software@biobrillouin.org>wrote: > > Hi All, > So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 > presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, > Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we > coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and > compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other > presentations/posters as relevant). > Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript > will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent > argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, > will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual > graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), > etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a > circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was > reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it > really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! > Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week > (i.e. 10-14^th November) > Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which > could work for you? > Mon 10^th Nov. 11-12am > Tue 11^th Nov. 2-3pm > Thur 13^th Nov 12-1pm > Fri 14^th Nov 9-10am > All the best, > Kareem > _______________________________________________ > Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org > To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org <collaboration-logo.svg>_______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi @ll, Thanks for the logo Sebastian, that’s perfect :) Here is the poster. Best, Pierre  Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 11/11/25, at 18:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Following our meeting, I've made the changes to my proposed schema/logo:
<GQIVWthv84lwtwJ2.png>
- "Unified Brillouin Scattering Toolkit" for the title - Brimfile: BLS Bio-image application - HDF5_BLS: Biophysics & data processing
Are we all fine with the text ?
Here's also the svg : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gbkEb_Sdsf86yCNoDhwoNXqoU2iJgXcu?usp... and I'll put my poster there too later
Best,
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 06.11.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi Sebastian,
I really like your idea and visual! I don’t think on our side at least the colors will be a problem so as long as you have thumbs up on your side we should be OK. The only two remarks I have are 1 - The HDF5_BLS project is not only a unified solution for data processing in BLS but also for storing data from all BLS modalities (and any other complimentary modality). 2 - BrimView is not compatible with the HDF5_BLS project, and from what I understand, only uses the HDF5_BLS_treat package for the integrated algorithm you have defined (ie: it does not take advantage of the modularity of algorithms at the core of the module, it does not allow the user to go through the algorithm to change any of the parameters of the functions - eg the size of the window before the fit or the boundary conditions on the linewidth, is not able to run a stored HDF5_BLS_treat algorithm and does not allow neither import nor export of these algorithms as standalone JSON files). This is why I thought going with a “non-BLS end-users” vs “BLS researchers” was more interesting: it allowed to logically differentiate our two approaches without opposing them as the needs of these two communities are very different (the analogy I made with high-level and low-level programming).
Let me know what you think :)
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 6/11/25, at 14:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I like your idea of having some reference to the other presentations. Maybe instead of a dichotomy, we could reference all 3 presentations ? See attached my attempt.
On my poster BrimView would be on top and "highlighted" in green, on your poster the HDF5_BLS one, and on Carlo's the BrimFile. (The color palette should work with EMBL green and meduniwien green - the one from the webpage).
<KSrWrdrRpXoqZQuC.png>
(FYI: I made the SVG with inkscape, and for me it doesn't display as expected with Edge)
Best,
Sebastian
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 05.11.2025 um 09:59 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi @ll :)
Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports.
Best,
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 20:58 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>
Dear Robert,
Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding.
Best, Nina
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839)
This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...>
Dear Nina,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839).
We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions.
We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field.
Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process.
With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort,
Robert (on behalf of all authors) -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de> http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Hi Sal,
I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best!
Cheers, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/>
> On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. > > On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? > > Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, > > Best, > > Sal > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Salvatore La Cavera III > Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow > Nottingham Research Fellow > Optics and Photonics Group > University of Nottingham > Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> > ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 > <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> > Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! > > > From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> > Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 > To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> > Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> > Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 > > Hi Kareem, > > thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. > > Best, > Robert > -- > Dr. Robert Prevedel > Group Leader and Senior Scientist > Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit > European Molecular Biology Laboratory > Meyerhofstr. 1 > 69117 Heidelberg, Germany > > Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 > Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/> > > > > > > >> On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). >> >> Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! >> >> Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) >> Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? >> >> Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am >> Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm >> Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm >> Fri 14th Nov 9-10am >> >> All the best, >> Kareem >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> <collaboration-logo.svg>_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi Pierre, thanks for sharing the poster. We had a look together and have some general comments to ensure a coherent presentation. They are attached inside the pdf. Note we used Preview for this, not sure they show on Acrobat. Let us know if you can’t see them. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de 
On 12.11.2025, at 09:14, Pierre Bouvet via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi @ll,
Thanks for the logo Sebastian, that’s perfect :) Here is the poster.
Best,
Pierre
<Poster_v2.pdf>
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 11/11/25, at 18:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Following our meeting, I've made the changes to my proposed schema/logo:
<GQIVWthv84lwtwJ2.png>
- "Unified Brillouin Scattering Toolkit" for the title - Brimfile: BLS Bio-image application - HDF5_BLS: Biophysics & data processing
Are we all fine with the text ?
Here's also the svg : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gbkEb_Sdsf86yCNoDhwoNXqoU2iJgXcu?usp... and I'll put my poster there too later
Best,
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 06.11.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi Sebastian,
I really like your idea and visual! I don’t think on our side at least the colors will be a problem so as long as you have thumbs up on your side we should be OK. The only two remarks I have are 1 - The HDF5_BLS project is not only a unified solution for data processing in BLS but also for storing data from all BLS modalities (and any other complimentary modality). 2 - BrimView is not compatible with the HDF5_BLS project, and from what I understand, only uses the HDF5_BLS_treat package for the integrated algorithm you have defined (ie: it does not take advantage of the modularity of algorithms at the core of the module, it does not allow the user to go through the algorithm to change any of the parameters of the functions - eg the size of the window before the fit or the boundary conditions on the linewidth, is not able to run a stored HDF5_BLS_treat algorithm and does not allow neither import nor export of these algorithms as standalone JSON files). This is why I thought going with a “non-BLS end-users” vs “BLS researchers” was more interesting: it allowed to logically differentiate our two approaches without opposing them as the needs of these two communities are very different (the analogy I made with high-level and low-level programming).
Let me know what you think :)
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 6/11/25, at 14:11, Sebastian Hambura via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I like your idea of having some reference to the other presentations. Maybe instead of a dichotomy, we could reference all 3 presentations ? See attached my attempt.
On my poster BrimView would be on top and "highlighted" in green, on your poster the HDF5_BLS one, and on Carlo's the BrimFile. (The color palette should work with EMBL green and meduniwien green - the one from the webpage).
<KSrWrdrRpXoqZQuC.png>
(FYI: I made the SVG with inkscape, and for me it doesn't display as expected with Edge)
Best,
Sebastian
Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 05.11.2025 um 09:59 schrieb Pierre Bouvet via Software:
Hi @ll :)
Great news for the preprint, thanks Robert! :) Following the idea of presenting the projects as complimenting each other on the presentation supports, I propose to assign a project for a use case and more globally a user. For Brim, you are focusing on spatial maps for non-BLS experts, for HDF5_BLS I focus on unifying treatments and analysis independently of BLS modality, targeting therefore BLS researchers. Visually we could therefore divide the users in “BLS experts” and “BLS end-users”. Orally we could use the analogy with high-level programming for Brim (low user complexity, low adaptability) and low-level programming for HDF5_BLS (higher user complexity, higher adaptability), and underline the use of the same treatment algorithms and the ability to export from HDF5_BLS to Brim spatial images. Here is a svg file with a schematic to illustrate this idea simply. If this is OK with you, we could add this to the poster and oral presentation supports.
Best,
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
On 4/11/25, at 15:53, Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
That is awesome news, well chased Robert! :)
--------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 <Outlook-ubrf1hlt.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me!
From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> Sent: 03 November 2025 20:58 To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025
Dear all, great news - seems like the reminder helped ;-) Cheers, Robert
> Begin forwarded message: > > From: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> > Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) > Date: 3. November 2025 at 21:34:24 CET > To: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> > Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> > > Dear Robert, > > Thanks for getting in touch. I am sorry about the further delays. But I have managed to read your manuscript, and we have decided to send your manuscript out for peer review. I simply haven’t had a chance to assign reviewers yet, which is the reason that you haven’t received a notification. I should be able to assign reviewers later today though. Thanks for understanding. > > Best, > Nina > > From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> > Date: Monday, November 3, 2025 at 3:31 PM > To: Nina Vogt <nina.vogt@us.nature.com> <mailto:nina.vogt@us.nature.com> > Cc: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> > Subject: Re: Proposal for a Correspondence on Standardization in Brillouin Microscopy (NMETH-C62839) > > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!phxqe2aeciYfb...> > > Dear Nina, > > I hope you are doing well. I wanted to kindly follow up on our manuscript entitled “A standardized file format and open-source analysis framework for Brillouin microscopy data,” which we submitted on September 17, 2025 (NMETH-C62839). > > We completely understand how demanding the current circumstances must be and truly appreciate your efforts and care that you put into handling submissions. > > We remain very enthusiastic about the possibility of publishing this work in Nature Methods. Given the growing interest in Brillouin microscopy and the increasing need for data standardization, we believe our contribution comes at a particularly timely moment for the field. > > Whenever convenient, we would be grateful for any brief update you might be able to share regarding the status of our submission or the review process. > > With warm regards and many thanks again for your time and effort, > > Robert > (on behalf of all authors) > -- > Dr. Robert Prevedel > Group Leader and Senior Scientist > Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit > European Molecular Biology Laboratory > Meyerhofstr. 1 > 69117 Heidelberg, Germany > > Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 > Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de> > http://www.prevedel.embl.de <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.prevedel.embl.de__;!!NLFGqXoFfo8MMQ!q...>
> On 03.11.2025, at 15:46, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > Ah ok yeah that makes sense, but also like you said that's quite a long time! Hopefully Nina likes it though, fingers crossed. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Salvatore La Cavera III > Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow > Nottingham Research Fellow > Optics and Photonics Group > University of Nottingham > Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> > ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 > <Outlook-fwnuyhf3.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> > Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! > > > From: Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> <mailto:prevedel@embl.de> > Sent: 03 November 2025 12:14 > To: Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> > Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> > Subject: Re: [Software] Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 > > Hi Sal, > > I emailed the editor one month ago already and got the response they are understaffed and we should be patient. Nevertheless I think by now it’s ok to re-inquire - I’ve never had a paper sit with an editor that long. If they don’t like it they should at least tell us so we’re not loosing more time. I am gonna email her later today or tomorrow, let’s hope for the best! > > Cheers, > Robert > -- > Dr. Robert Prevedel > Group Leader and Senior Scientist > Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit > European Molecular Biology Laboratory > Meyerhofstr. 1 > 69117 Heidelberg, Germany > > Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 > Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/> > > > > > > >> On 03.11.2025, at 11:34, Sal La Cavera III (staff) <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> <mailto:Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. >> >> On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? >> >> Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, >> >> Best, >> >> Sal >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Salvatore La Cavera III >> Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow >> Nottingham Research Fellow >> Optics and Photonics Group >> University of Nottingham >> Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk> >> ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 >> <Outlook-0n0qekvu.png> <https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/6a3f960a8e89429cb6fc693c01d10119@...> >> Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! >> >> >> From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> >> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 >> To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> <mailto:kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> >> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> >> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 >> >> Hi Kareem, >> >> thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. >> >> Best, >> Robert >> -- >> Dr. Robert Prevedel >> Group Leader and Senior Scientist >> Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit >> European Molecular Biology Laboratory >> Meyerhofstr. 1 >> 69117 Heidelberg, Germany >> >> Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 >> Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de <mailto:robert.prevedel@embl.de>http://www.prevedel.embl.de <http://www.prevedel.embl.de/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). >>> >>> Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! >>> >>> Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) >>> Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? >>> >>> Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am >>> Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm >>> Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm >>> Fri 14th Nov 9-10am >>> >>> All the best, >>> Kareem >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org> <collaboration-logo.svg>_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software@biobrillouin.org> To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org <mailto:software-leave@biobrillouin.org>
Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi @ll - Logo: I changed the logo to have “Data” in the title. Here are the SVG file I used with the 3 variations for Brim and Brimview (the text in the file on the drive appeared crooked on my computer). - “HDF5_BLS project” vs “HDF5_BLS”: I think it’s important to differentiate the module that deals with the format from the project. The project aims at unifying the processing of data and can be discussed/worked on whereas the format is a fixed solution I propose that can serve as the basis for the aim of unifying the community. In the context of this poster, I believe it’s important to keep the distinction. If you don’t like “project” I could use “framework”, “environment” or “solution” instead, I’m open to any other suggestions - BrimX: I’ve added a reference to BrimX in the text box, but the title has to be “HDF5_BLS” since this is the name of the Python module. - "relevant metadata”: added - last sentence of FAQ: removed. I initially added that sentence to try and underline a potential benefit of Brim over HDF5_BLS. Currently, I have a few Gb of Brillouin images stored in HDF5 files so from a purely technical point of view, there’s no need to use Brim for Brillouin imaging as everything that can be done with Brim can be done with HDF5_BLS (but not the other way around). Where Brim shines (I think) is in the idea of having a dedicated way of storing hyper spectral images and in the ability of opening them directly as hyper spectral images on a dedicated interface, something that I think doesn’t exist yet (or at least I haven’t found it). This I think benefits mostly the end users that are not familiar with BLS rather than us who already have hundreds (if not thousands) of scripts able to deal with BLS data and the knowledge to rapidly assess what went wrong on occasional outliers. - “establishing BLS as standard”: I agree, the formulation is too strong. What do you think of “we move towards validating the potential of BLS as a new standard for the quantification of mechanical properties” -> the goal is to contrast with the introductory frame where I underline the differences between measures we report (although not directly) in the consensus paper. Best, Pierre Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria 
On 12/11/25, at 15:26, Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> wrote:
Hi Pierre, thanks for accommodating - to quickly answer some points: -) Maybe call it ‘package’ instead of environment? -) for the last comment reg. establishing BLS as standard: Maybe better to just say “we enable reproducable and standardized ways to store, process and visualize BLS data." I’ll disregard your comment about that "there’s no need to use Brim for Brillouin imaging as everything that can be done with Brim can be done with HDF5_BLS (but not the other way around).” Hopefully we can move past this tug-of-war at some point? It is really frustrating and will certainly not help the paper and larger goal that we both have in mind. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 12.11.2025, at 17:25, Pierre Bouvet via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi @ll
- Logo: I changed the logo to have “Data” in the title. Here are the SVG file I used with the 3 variations for Brim and Brimview (the text in the file on the drive appeared crooked on my computer). - “HDF5_BLS project” vs “HDF5_BLS”: I think it’s important to differentiate the module that deals with the format from the project. The project aims at unifying the processing of data and can be discussed/worked on whereas the format is a fixed solution I propose that can serve as the basis for the aim of unifying the community. In the context of this poster, I believe it’s important to keep the distinction. If you don’t like “project” I could use “framework”, “environment” or “solution” instead, I’m open to any other suggestions - BrimX: I’ve added a reference to BrimX in the text box, but the title has to be “HDF5_BLS” since this is the name of the Python module. - "relevant metadata”: added - last sentence of FAQ: removed. I initially added that sentence to try and underline a potential benefit of Brim over HDF5_BLS. Currently, I have a few Gb of Brillouin images stored in HDF5 files so from a purely technical point of view, there’s no need to use Brim for Brillouin imaging as everything that can be done with Brim can be done with HDF5_BLS (but not the other way around). Where Brim shines (I think) is in the idea of having a dedicated way of storing hyper spectral images and in the ability of opening them directly as hyper spectral images on a dedicated interface, something that I think doesn’t exist yet (or at least I haven’t found it). This I think benefits mostly the end users that are not familiar with BLS rather than us who already have hundreds (if not thousands) of scripts able to deal with BLS data and the knowledge to rapidly assess what went wrong on occasional outliers. - “establishing BLS as standard”: I agree, the formulation is too strong. What do you think of “we move towards validating the potential of BLS as a new standard for the quantification of mechanical properties” -> the goal is to contrast with the introductory frame where I underline the differences between measures we report (although not directly) in the consensus paper.
Best,
Pierre
Pierre Bouvet, PhD Post-doctoral Fellow Medical University Vienna Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, Austria
<collaboration-logo.svg> <Poster_v3.pdf>
On 12/11/25, at 15:26, Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
Hi all, Here is my poster :) Best, Sebastian Hambura Software Engineer Robert Prevedel Group Cell Biology and Biophysics EMBL Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Am 12.11.2025 um 17:48 schrieb Robert Prevedel via Software:
Hi Pierre,
thanks for accommodating - to quickly answer some points:
-) Maybe call it ‘package’ instead of environment?
-) for the last comment reg. establishing BLS as standard: Maybe better to just say “we enable reproducable and standardized ways to store, process and visualize BLS data."
I’ll disregard your comment about that "there’s no need to use Brim for Brillouin imaging as everything that can be done with Brim can be done with HDF5_BLS (but not the other way around).” Hopefully we can move past this tug-of-war at some point? It is really frustrating and will certainly not help the paper and larger goal that we both have in mind.
Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de
On 12.11.2025, at 17:25, Pierre Bouvet via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote:
Hi @ll
- Logo: I changed the logo to have “Data” in the title. Here are the SVG file I used with the 3 variations for Brim and Brimview (the text in the file on the drive appeared crooked on my computer). - “HDF5_BLS project” vs “HDF5_BLS”: I think it’s important to differentiate the module that deals with the format from the project. The project aims at unifying the processing of data and can be discussed/worked on whereas the format is a fixed solution I propose that can serve as the basis for the aim of unifying the community. In the context of this poster, I believe it’s important to keep the distinction. If you don’t like “project” I could use “framework”, “environment” or “solution” instead, I’m open to any other suggestions - BrimX: I’ve added a reference to BrimX in the text box, but the title has to be “HDF5_BLS” since this is the name of the Python module. - "relevant metadata”: added - last sentence of FAQ: removed. I initially added that sentence to try and underline a potential benefit of Brim over HDF5_BLS. Currently, I have a few Gb of Brillouin images stored in HDF5 files so from a purely technical point of view, there’s no need to use Brim for Brillouin imaging as everything that can be done with Brim can be done with HDF5_BLS (but not the other way around). Where Brim shines (I think) is in the idea of having a dedicated way of storing hyper spectral images and in the ability of opening them directly as hyper spectral images on a dedicated interface, something that I think doesn’t exist yet (or at least I haven’t found it). This I think benefits mostly the end users that are not familiar with BLS rather than us who already have hundreds (if not thousands) of scripts able to deal with BLS data and the knowledge to rapidly assess what went wrong on occasional outliers. - “establishing BLS as standard”: I agree, the formulation is too strong. What do you think of “we move towards validating the potential of BLS as a new standard for the quantification of mechanical properties” -> the goal is to contrast with the introductory frame where I underline the differences between measures we report (although not directly) in the consensus paper.
Best,
Pierre
/Pierre Bouvet, PhD/ /Post-doctoral Fellow/ /Medical University Vienna/ /Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology/ /Wahringer Straße 13, 1090 Wien, //Austria/
<collaboration-logo.svg> <Poster_v3.pdf>
On 12/11/25, at 15:26, Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org
_______________________________________________ Software mailing list --software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email tosoftware-leave@biobrillouin.org
Great, let’s do Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm then (hopefully won’t take whole hr but am blocking just incase). Here is Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/5191046969?pwd=alpzaldoZEd3N2ZEQ0hYZU1RR1dOdz09 Meeting ID: 519 104 6969 Passcode: jY3zH8 Great also that Nina will send out for review – think it would have been out of character if she wouldn’t since this is right up this journals correspondence-piece alley (just hope she picks usual/recommended BLS folks – let’s see 😊)! All the best and talk soon, Kareem From: "Sal La Cavera III (staff) via Software" <software@biobrillouin.org> Reply to: "Sal La Cavera III (staff)" <Salvatore.LaCaveraIII@nottingham.ac.uk> Date: Monday, 3. November 2025 at 11:34 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at>, Robert Prevedel <prevedel@embl.de> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi everyone, Yes totally agree re: coordinating a coherent team message for the different presentations. I'm mainly free on those Mon/Tues slots. On a side note, it still looks like the manuscript hasn't passed the editorial sift. Does anyone have any intel on that or is it worth a friendly email to Nina asking how it's going? Looking forward to seeing everyone in Berlin, Best, Sal --------------------------------------------------------------- Salvatore La Cavera III Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellow Nottingham Research Fellow Optics and Photonics Group University of Nottingham Email: salvatore.lacaveraiii@nottingham.ac.uk ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0210-3102 Book a Coffee and Research chat with me! From: Robert Prevedel via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Sent: 03 November 2025 08:24 To: Kareem Elsayad <kareem.elsayad@meduniwien.ac.at> Cc: Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> Subject: [Software] Re: Meeting to discuss presentations of software at BioBrillouin 2025 Hi Kareem, thanks for organizing - I fully agree it’d be great to coordinate and present a coherent story. I could do the Mon. and Tue. slots, and maybe the Thu. one if really needed. Fri. I am busy. Best, Robert -- Dr. Robert Prevedel Group Leader and Senior Scientist Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory Meyerhofstr. 1 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 387-8722 Email: robert.prevedel@embl.de http://www.prevedel.embl.de On 03.11.2025, at 01:02, Kareem Elsayad via Software <software@biobrillouin.org> wrote: Hi All, So, at the BioBrillouin meeting in Berlin we have 3 presentations on software stuff ( Carlo=talk, Sebastian=poster, Pierre=Poster) – this is great! Think it would be good if we coordinate a little so as to present coherent message and compliment each others stuff (even directing people to other presentations/posters as relevant). Politically seen, since some (potential) reviewers of manuscript will most likely (certainly) be there, presenting coherent argument of how the different parts are needed for the whole, will look very good. I would propose the idea of having a visual graphic, e.g. a tree or some spider diagram (is that a word?), etc., that everyone includes in their presentation, with e.g. a circle around the part that they are presenting. If I was reviewer from an outside perspective this would look like it really is a serious and coherent thought through effort! Would propose a quick (~1/2 hr) meeting sometime after next week (i.e. 10-14th November) Below are four times that would work for me.. let me know which could work for you? Mon 10th Nov. 11-12am Tue 11th Nov. 2-3pm Thur 13th Nov 12-1pm Fri 14th Nov 9-10am All the best, Kareem _______________________________________________ Software mailing list -- software@biobrillouin.org To unsubscribe send an email to software-leave@biobrillouin.org This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.
participants (5)
-
Kareem Elsayad -
Pierre Bouvet -
Robert Prevedel -
Sal La Cavera III (staff) -
Sebastian Hambura